Call Combinations Differ Among Living Elephants

The living elephants – Asian elephat, African forest elephant and African savannah elephant.

Guest post by Michael Pardo

Ask most people what sound an elephant makes and they are likely to think of a trumpet. In reality though, elephants produce an incredible variety of different vocalizations. The most common call is a deep, pulsating rumble, so low-pitched that human observers sometimes feel it more than hear it. Elephants also roar—powerful, bellowing sounds that carry across the landscape. And sometimes, they give combination calls, in which one or two rumbles and roars are stitched together with no pause for breath.

I visited Udawalawe in 2014 to work with the Udawalawe Elephant Research Project, and was especially fascinated by these combination calls. Combining meaningful units into sequences with an additional meaning is a key component of human language, but there are relatively few examples of this phenomenon in other species. Listening to the Udawalawe elephants, I was struck by the fact that they nearly always produced combination calls in the same order: a single roar followed by a single rumble. Why was this? Could it be analogous to grammatical rules in human language? Or could it be as simple as an anatomical constraint that made it difficult for the elephants to produce a rumble before a roar?

Of course, my experience was so far limited to Asian elephants from Udawalawe. Most researchers recognize three living species of elephants: Asian elephants (Elephas maximus), African savannah elephants (Loxodonta africana), and African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis), with the two African species being most closely related to each other. I didn’t know if either African species produced combination calls with the same kind of stereotyped structure observed in Asian elephants.

After I returned from Sri Lanka to the United States, I had the opportunity to listen to some recordings of African forest elephants collected by the Elephant Listening Project at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. I was intrigued and surprised to discover that African forest elephants produced combination calls in a variety of different orders. Unlike the Asian elephants I was used to, African forest elephants appeared to produce rumble-roar and rumble-roar-rumble combinations at least as often as roar-rumbles. I decided to write a paper comparing the combination calls of Asian elephants and African forest elephants, in collaboration with experts on these two species: Shermin de Silva and Peter Wrege.

I thought it would only take a few months, but what I had initially envisioned as a short project quickly ballooned into a massive undertaking. Realizing that the paper would be more complete if we included all three elephant species, we invited three colleagues who study African savannah elephants (Angela Stoeger, Joyce Poole, and Caitlin O’Connell) to contribute their data as well. Not yet satisfied, we expanded the scope of our analysis, including data on the behavioral contexts in which the calls were produced, as well as a number of other variables. Three and a half years and countless revisions later, the study was finally complete.

Graphs of “combination” calls which consist of roars and low-frequency rumbles. From top to bottom: African savannah elephant, African forest elephant and Asian elephant.

Our findings confirmed my initial impression that Asian elephants primarily produce roar-rumble combinations, while African forest elephants produce a more even mix of roar-rumbles, rumble-roars, and rumble-roar-rumbles. Somewhat unexpectedly however, African savannah elephants also heavily favored roar-rumbles—more like the distantly related Asian elephant than like their close cousin, the African forest elephant. This suggests that the differences among the combination calls of the three species are the result of relatively recent evolutionary changes, and might have something to do with ecological or social differences among the species.

Even more intriguingly, the order of a combination call was correlated with the behavioral context in which it was given, raising the possibility that calls with different orders have different meanings. For example, even though African savannah elephants primarily produced roar-rumble combination calls in most contexts, they were more likely to give rumble-roar-rumbles when separated from their group. If elephants can convey different messages by recombining roars and rumbles in different orders, this would be a remarkable example of communicative flexibility. It might even help us understand the conditions that led to the evolution of grammar in our own species long ago.

As with most scientific endeavors, our study has left us with more questions than it has answered. Why do African forest elephants order their combination calls in such a markedly different pattern than the other two species? Do combination calls with different orders mean different things?  Do calls with the same order mean the same thing in different species? Our analyses suggested that in addition to the clear differences among species in the preferred order of combination calls, there were some differences among populations of the same species as well. Might this be due to culturally learned dialects, such as those found in many bird species? It is my hope that our study will pave the way for future work to address these fascinating queries.


Pardo, Michael A., et al. “Differences in combinatorial calls among the 3 elephant species cannot be explained by phylogeny.” Behavioral Ecology (2019). [Link to paper]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s